WebRobert Nozick, a libertarian philosopher, has three arguments against redistribution. The first argument observes that government tends to redistribute wealth according to some pattern. For example, it tends to tax rich people and spend money on poor people, so that there is more equality in the distribution of income, wealth, and other resources. WebRobert Nozick (1974, p 169) for example, has argued that redistribution in the form of compulsory taxation is morally on par with forced labor. And he has famously criticized egalitarian principles of distributive justice, such as Rawls’s difference principle (which categorizes as unjust any national economic order …

The (Libertarian) Case for Reparations

WebNov 20, 2024 · In 1974, Robert Nozick famously claimed, “taxation of earnings is on a par with forced labor.”. If we assume that forced labor is morally objectionable, something akin to slavery, then Nozick ... WebJul 9, 2015 · 00:25. 03:21. Nevertheless, it's still garbage. Nozick's book constructs a detailed procedural account of justice, arguing that redistributive taxation is theft because … if the congress overrides a veto the bill

CMV: The idea that taxation is theft is a clear sign of a ... - Reddit

WebSociety is unpredictable and humans are imperfect Robert Nozick Right Wing Libertarian Robert Nozick on the state The individual is sovereign and therefore the state should not restrict the individual Robert Nozick quote No state more extensive than the … WebRobert Nozick, I believe, was the first to propose an argument for something like this, in his book Anarchy, State, and Utopia, pg. 169-172. I quote from pg. 169: Taxation of earnings from labor is on a par with forced labor. WebRobert Nozick Quote. Quotes by Category Quotes by Person Quotes of the Day "Taxation of earnings from labor is on a par with forced labor. Seizing the results of someone’s labor … is switch backwards compatible